FIS is Looking for Drupal Developers

Our clear extorting evidence cannot be used as unsettled Christian Louboutin Sale,
　　On 13 may, Zhao for sea receive Shangqiu city in the State compensation payments and life difficulties and grant-in-aid total RMB 65 million, Prior to this, the Supreme People's Court in Henan identified Zhao for sea intentional homicide case lines together unjustly Zhao for sea was acquitted. Profile picture

　　Comprehensive news agency-the Supreme People's Court, Christian Louboutin,the Supreme People's Procuratorate, the Ministry of public security, the Department of Homeland Security and Department of Justice may 30, on the joint publication of the death penalty cases judgement of evidence issues (hereinafter referred to as the death penalty case evidence ")Christian Louboutin Wedding Shoes, and the handling of criminal cases in the exclusion of illegally obtained evidence issues (hereinafter referred to as the exclusionary rules"), requires that all levels of political and legal authorities strictly enforce the criminal law and criminal procedure law, the punishment of the crime in accordance with law and protection of human rights, ensure that the handling of each case stood the test of history.
　　Stringent capital cases evidence collection Louboutin Shoes,
　　Legislative lead, Central procuratorial after extensive research and demonstration, two of the regulations, on the judicial authorities for criminal cases, particularly in capital cases higher standards and more stringent requirements. This is our country's criminal justice reform in China's criminal procedure further democratization and the rule of law.
　　The death penalty case evidence regulations not only provides for criminal prosecution evidence of a fundamental principle, subdivided the standard of proof of death penalty cases, further stringent specifications for various types of evidence collection, Ghd Straighteners Ireland,judgement and use.
　　The exclusionary provisions not only emphasizes the use of torture and other illegal means of testimonial evidence,Ghd Ireland, cannot be used as the basis for decision, but also further review and exclusion of illegally obtained evidence of the program, the burden of proof and examination staff at court issues specific specifications.
　　The training and judicial police and the law
　　The Department official said, the regulations implementing the good and perform well, and for improving the enforcement level, Ghdoutlet,dealing with the prevention of the occurrence of cases of injustice and wrong, will certainly play an important role.
　　According to reports, the central political and legal authorities will be in the appropriate manner in the politico policemen, especially those in solving, arrest and criminal justice and the execution of the work of the police and lawyers to conduct training.
　　■ Focus
　　The exclusionary rule "
　　Unlawfully obtained evidence could not be reached
　　Whether or not involving "torture" is desirable,Ghd Outlet Store interrogation officers witness
　　[Background] existing judicial interpretation though to a certain extent established illegal oral evidence exclusionary rule, but because of their content more principles, and does not require the appropriate procedures, resulting in the exclusion rules is difficult in judicial practice in the legal norms.
　　And existing legal and judicial interpretation, the exclusionary provisions of major reforms in the following five areas:
　　First, identify illegal oral evidence of connotation and denotation. In addition to the illegal evidence illegally testimonial evidence, there are illegal; while also highlighting to torture and other illegal means of testimonial evidence, illegal oral evidence shall be excluded.
　　Secondly, clear the log on as evidence of legitimacy investigation procedures. The defendant and his counsel to raise 1312383617 blog the accused before the trial is unlawfully obtained confession, the Court should be asked to provide evidence of illegal people, time, place, manner, content and other related clues or evidence. ”
　　Third, clarified by the prosecution before the trial for the accused to confess and the legitimacy of the onus of proof and the corresponding standards. The prosecution is not proof, or has not provided evidence,hellen87 blog, you must undertake not to the evidence of the alleged crimes of the legal consequences and responsibilities.
　　Fourth, clear examination staff to testify in court. Courts, for there is no torture and other unlawful act, the prosecution evidence is often inconsistent, verification very difficult. This clear examination staff witnesss, this is also an important new requirements.
　　Fifth, clarified the unlawfully obtained evidence, documentary evidence of the removal. On the unlawfully obtained evidence, documented evidence to be excluded, and there is a larger debate, judicial practice seldom be excluded. In order to regulate forensics activities that clearly spells out the evidence, the documentary evidence of the remarkable breach the law, may affect the impartiality of the judge shall supplement or make a reasonable explanation, otherwise, the evidence, if not as formalized under ".
　　The death penalty case evidence "
　　Inferential testimony cannot be used as evidence
　　Under the General life experience true testimony as evidence
　　[Background] in 1996, the national people's Congress on the code of criminal procedure, evidence system still compare principles, by three agencies on the implementation of specific provisions in the criminal procedure law has, to some extent, the substance of the specific content of the rules of evidence, but the lack of systematic and authority, cannot meet the needs of judicial practice.
　　And existing legal and judicial interpretation, the death penalty case evidence "as provided in the second part of the contents of the major changes in the following four aspects:
　　First, clear for obvious violations of the law and the relevant provisions of the evidence could not be used as the basis for decision, should be excluded. This is the death penalty case evidence "added new content. By investigating and inspection, search, seizure of physical evidence extracted, no verification, inspection, search, extract, holds the record, you cannot prove that the evidence, the documentary evidence of origin; to torture and other illegal means to obtain testimony; using violence, threats, and other methods to obtain witnesses, to make the conclusion of the forensic institutions do not have statutory qualifications and conditions, or the identification of issues beyond the scope of accreditation organization, business; investigating and examination there obviously not in conformity with the laws and regulations, and cannot give a reasonable explanation or description.
　　Second, to establish their views on the rules of evidence. "The witness of speculative, commentary, inferential testimony could not be used as evidence, but there is a general life experience of truth. "China's criminal procedure law has no provisions concerning the views of the evidence. The death penalty cases that clearly this evidence rule, truthfully provide benefit to standardizing witness their perception of the facts of the case demonstrate that activities, avoid will witness your own guesses, comments, inferred as their perception of the facts to make on the facts of a case.
　　Two other points including, further established the original evidence precedence rules, specifically does not reflect the original evidence, documented evidence of shape, features or content copy, the copy should be excluded; establishing a limited direct oral evidence rules requiring a witness should appear as a witness.
　　Cannot be used for the death penalty in the case of evidence
　　1 the Inquisition, inspection, search, seizure of physical evidence extracted, no verification, inspection, search, extract, holds the record, you cannot prove that the evidence, the documentary evidence of origin
[Automatically translated by Microsoft® Translator]